Final Blogtastic Reflection (#4)

For my final blog reflection for 4th quarter, I chose "Blagojevich on 'Celebrity Apprentice'" as my favorite blog post. The reason I like this one so much is because I feel very strongly about the subject. This usually characterizes my favorite posts. When you're really passionate about what you're writing about, it just makes it a lot more fun to write. And when I saw that Blagojevich was on a reality t.v. show and not in jail, I was just outraged. I was also able to incorporate a bunch of sources in this post, which I think adds depth and more credibility to a post. And from those sources, I used direct quotes and dissected them to prove my point even more. It just had more substance than some of my other posts.
This year I have really developed as a blogger. Not that I blogged before this class, but my style has changed since the beginning of the year. I started my blogging career by mostly writing about certain issues that I encountered in my everyday life, but didn't necessarily connect to class. But as the year continued, my posts started to become extensions of class discussions, which is what I think Mr. Bolos and Mr. O'Connor intended them to be. And when I could not extend the discussion to my blogging, I wrote about prominent issues in the news. Not always, but I tried to.
I have really enjoyed blogging this year because I do like to write, but essays can often times be laborious and they take a long time to do. On the other hand, a blog post doesn't have to be long. You can write a little about a lot, and that's what I've really liked about blogging this year.

Friday, November 6, 2009

What IS The Definition of Success?

     Three times a week I have 4th period free and I always go the the second floor rotunda to sit with my friends. While I was there today, Mr. Sally, who is apparently the assistant superintendent, came around  asking people if they would like to be filmed for a video that would be shown during the teacher's institute day. He said that in the clip, you would describe your definition of success, how you thought New Trier defined success, and if you thought they were defining it right. No one accepted for obvious reasons, but it really got me thinking. It seems like a very simple question, but I could not give an answer. Dictionary.com defines success as "a person or thing that is successful"(which is not helpful at all). But what did I define as success? Getting a B+ in physics? Moving up a level in French? I didn't know. And I still don't know. Maybe no one wanted to be in the movie because no one actually knew what success meant for them. To be honest, I don't know what success means for me. I never really feel successful. Even if I get straight A's one quarter, I don't feel like I've accomplished anything. My parents will tell me good job, and sometimes even my grandparents will call to congratulate me, but I don't understand why. I don't feel like I really did anything that amazing. I guess you could say that I succeeded, but aren't you supposed to feel something more than indifference?
     Then I tried to think about what New Trier defined as success. And I came up with two definitions, one that they tell parents and students, and one that isn't necessarily said, but everyone pretty much knows. The first and what the school would say is: getting good grades, getting into college, and having good morals, (hence the ECGC that no advisory actually does). And now the underlying definition, which is just an extension from the first: getting good grades in all 4 levels, getting into an ivy league school, participating in extracurriculars, sports, and social service, and having good morals. I think New Trier students set unrealistic goals for themselves that no one would be able to accomplish. It astonishes me that people can be in two AP classes and three other level 4 classes, all while managing a social life. In the words of my history teacher last year, "If you want to have a life next year, don't take AP history". Needless to say, I followed her advice.
     I guess what I'm trying to say is that New Trier pushes its students to the limit. They know that the students who go here will be the next generation of great lawyers, doctors, politicians, and businessmen. They push us and push us and load us with work until we crack or have a mental breakdown. And I can say from personal experience that it can definitely happen more than once a year. For me, I work so hard during the year that by the time summer comes around, I can't see my success because all the work and suffering blinded me to it during the year. But maybe that's just me.

3 comments:

  1. Maybe that's NOT just you, Zoe. I really enjoyed reading this post for its brutal honesty and I agree with much of what you have observed, having taught AP last year.

    I know that our school has an initiative for "Healthy and Balanced Life" in addition to the "Ethical Conduct and Global Citizenship" (ECGC) you mentioned. Would you say that the "Healthy and Balanced Life" is yet another example that "no advisory actually does"??

    ReplyDelete
  2. If I may respond to Mr. Bolos's question: "healthy and balanced life" has never even been mentioned in my advisery. This blogpost is the first I ever heard of it. New Trier has a lot of conflicting interests working to get to the students. Get into college, stay healthy, create social connection, reduce competition, win every competition, etc. How can anyone achieve success by all those (and more) criteria?

    I have a suggestion for you, Zoe. It may help with your sense of success to see what people in other schools see as achievements and then celebrate those things as you achieve them. I don't know how good the first half of my idea is, but celebration gives a more concrete sense of "yes, this was a success".

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you Zoe, that New Trier pushes students to reach unattainable goals. I think the reason the New Trier district does this is because we compare ourselves with everyone around us, and since we all go to a very good school, its hard to be the best. I think success should be defined on a personal basis.

    I attended a lecture over the summer about cross country (xc) running and he said that xc is constant test against your "box", This "box" being your individual potential. He said we should strive to push the limits of our box daily, but we shouldn't compare the size of our box to others. I think that success is being able to exceed the limits of your box. Sorry for the figurative description, but I think success is to broad to be described literally.

    ReplyDelete