I thought about how there was not any dialogue in "The Kid." But I thought that dialogue in this film was actually irrelevant. It didn't really matter what they were saying. You could still see and feel their emotions. And that's why I believe movies have actually regressed in the past couple of decades. Without sound, the actor truly has to act. They are trying to convey an emotion to the viewer solely through their facial expressions and body. Modern actors can rely on words to convey emotions; they don't necessarily have to show the emotion on their face if they have words to do the same job.
I also think that movie plots have regressed, too. Most movies these days are just about the "wow" factor, purely for entertainment and to make a quick buck or two. I'm not gonna lie, I love going to see chick flicks with my mom. But what I really love is a good movie that makes you think. One that doesn't have a clear cut ending, but forces the viewer to use their brain. To me, I know it's a good movie when I'm still thinking about it a week later. But unfortunately, there are not too many movies like that anymore. "The Kid" was a nice example of movies could be like, and that's why I enjoyed it so much. It had a simple plot, but the characters had very complex emotions. It didn't have a clear cut ending, and I had to infer what was going to happen to the characters based on what I knew about them. I really appreciated that, and hope that movie makers today can learnd a few things from movies of the past.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Movies in Progression or Regression?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment